He FEELS it. But neither he nor his advisers have a clue how this happened!
HERE I tell HIM and You HOW it's been done!!
The international LEFTIST LYING MANIPULATING media-cartel took him standing up, and they knocked him OUT! AS Usual: led by cnn.
Mr. Trump feels he's been fooled. HERE he can read how this was done:
Watching the 1. presidential debate on cnn - which is NOT the news-service I trust!!!! - I was SERIOUSLY shocked: Never before have I seen him look so bad. How has this been done? The answers are here!
After the debate Mr. Trump complained about a "bad microphone". Hillary Clinton joked about that, trying again to make him ridiculous. But he was RIGHT!
Crazy thing is: They even have a congressional commitee watching and trying to figure out whether the debate was fair.
The 1. presidential debate was the MOST UNFAIR I've ever seen!
The congressional commitee CONFIRMED they gave him a bad microphone. That was the one for the auditorium. The international broadcast was only little affected, but it got worse by the manipulation, too (bad echoes, f.e., sometimes).
The problem could NOT BE NOTICED by hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide. Because it was the LOCAL mike that was bad!
They did this INTENTIONALLY. With the bad mike the auditorium was disturbed in - let's say: - understanding him, his jokes: meaning: he got LESS laughter, LESS applause.
This was CLEARLY done in FAVOUR of Hillary!
But there's MORE, it was even MUCH WORSE:
Trump is ONE FOOT taller than midget Hillary. So they made her look taller, him smaller. They gave her a favourite camera-position. They did not give Trump this privilege! They lifted her physically. In a fair deal the measurements of the speaker's desks used in the debate should be VERIFIED: I think she got a smaller one so she looked not so small. Chances are even the sizes were manipulated! They USED EVERY KNOWN TRICK in professional TV journalism!
But there's MORE, it was even MUCH WORSE:
The "moderators", which were "MANIPULATORS", basically, asked Trump 15 provoking questions to disturb him, to make him look angry, bad. Hillary: 2 questions, only. NOT provoking. The questions were asked in a way that Hillary could answer with a bright smile, telling the world what a nice charming warm woman she is, how she's gonna save the planet, the environment and how concerned she is about "her" people.
While we KNOW, her dominating concern is HER CORRUPTION!
The "moderators" addressed NONE of her SERIOUS CRIMINAL SCANDALS. NOT e-mails, NOT Benghazi, NOT the HUNDREDS of MILLIONS, even BILLIONS that were and are pouring into the Clinton's banks.
But there's MORE, it was even MUCH WORSE:
Hillary Clinton's body-language told: I am easy, I am charming, I am relaxed, I am in control of the situation. To me this gives a STRONG INDICATION that she was being briefed before the show that she would be put in the BEST LIGHT, NO, ZERO bad questions would be asked.
But there's MORE, it was even MUCH WORSE:
Most of the bad questions being asked, intended to show the supposed "bad side" of Mr. Trump, intended to demonstrate the tough, investigative journalism they did NOT use on Hillary!, were fired at him in the last minutes, when he was running out of time to react adequately.
But there's MORE, it was even MUCH WORSE:
cnn uses EVERY bad psychological TRICK they know. F.e.: People's minds connect to the RULE of "first number". This is what You remember, what they want You to remember. This is being used by trained speakers, in commercial advertising, in Your supermarket (BIG regular price in RED, crossed out, small below the reduced, the PROMOTION price. Message: "Puh, expensive! Now: CHEAP! I like it, I want it, I buy it NOW!").
One of mind science experiments is: they show the guinea-pigs a coin, telling them it is "500 years" old. Then they ask the participants what they think the coin might be worth. Most common answer: "500 US$." That's the trick, the RULE of "first number". Then they show the same old coin to others, telling them it is "2000 years" old. Then they ask the participants what they think the coin might be worth. Most common answer: "2000 US$." That's the trick, the RULE of "first number". The first number STICKS in Your brain!
Now cnn tells us: a "poll" says, that SIXTY percent of voters in the age of 18 to 29 voted for Hillary. This figure is completely unimportant, because what counts are the overall votes - and in a SERIOUS poll.
Following the RULE of "first number" cnn puts the message in Your brain: 60 percent of voters are for Hillary.
Manipulation? You being fooled?
YES! Manipulation! You being successfully fooled!
But there's MORE, it was even MUCH WORSE:
Interruption is a common game played to disturb the opponent, to confuse him, to divert him from a dangerous subject, to destroy his concentration, to make him look mad, angry. There are a lot of people out there counting interruptions. And let me hint that even these counts are often being manipulated. Serious counts say: Hillary was interrupted by the "moderators" 6 times. They interrupted Mr. Trump 21 TWENTY ONE times. At LEAST. Some say it was more than 40 times. Whatever!
In the meantime, a few days after the 1. presidential debate there are people saying their analysis showed that there was even interaction between CROOKED Hillary and the CROOKED moderator Lester Holt. They say whenever she scratched her nose he interrupted Trump.
Manipulation? You being fooled?
YES! Manipulation! You being successfully fooled!
But there's MORE, it was even MUCH WORSE:
After the 1. presidential debate cnn IMMEDIATELY had a "poll" at hand saying that the VAST MAJORITY saw Hillary the WINNER. More than 60%, they said.
My sources say: this "poll" was manipulated. The people being asked in the "poll" were 65% fans of Hillary Clinton, and only 35% followers/admirers of Donald Trump.
Manipulation? You being fooled?
YES! Manipulation! You being successfully fooled!
But there's MORE, it was even MUCH WORSE:
There is PROOF that "moderator", Hillary's soldier Lester Holt was wired (watch his RIGHT ear! You SEE it! From min 2:20 on in the video 3 "Podiumgate" You can see him even reach into the back of his coat at the neck to fix the wire, the transceiver! You can see the cable going down to hi right side.), meaning he wore an earpiece to recieve directions: this is a CLEAR VIOLATION of the RULES setup by the Commitee for the debate. Many people even think that Hillary herself was WIRED.
Hillary was WIRED! The evidence. See it with Your own eyes!
After the debate ended, everybody ran around talking, shaking hands, and so on. But there were also VERY STRANGE things going on while everybody focused on the main actors. If You take a look in the background there were several people fiddling with CROOKED Hillary's desk ALL THE TIME.
First point showing up is that I was right: Clinton's desk was SMALLER than Trump's to make her look TALLER. I show You!
You have to understand: the speakers' desks should be DESKS equipped with a microphone. The speaker is OK and sticking to the RULES PLAYING FAIR bringing paper sheets. NOTHING ELSE, not even a tablet. Because a tablet can pass information to him right away.
And NOW we look at the EVIDENCE that You would NEVER have noticed by Your own!
Donald Trump PLAYED FAIR in the debate: he was the SHEEP! CROOKED Hillary's desk was FULL of electronics, up to the hilt!
Even You as an amateur can see it if You KNOW what to look at. And that's Hillary's desk in the background, and all the people doing strange things there, while NOBODY is doing things with Trump's desk!
The EVIDENCE CLEARLY shows Hillary's electronics, and she had even assistance ON HER DESK with a TABLET PLUS TELEPROMPTER!!!!!!!!
In this video - do NOT watch Hillary and Donald! Look at the WHITE TELEPROMPTER DISPLAY on Hillary's desk: It's turned ON (=white) when she's near, it turns OFF (=black) when she walks away. Nobody notices, since nobody thought this possible!
In the next video You watch seconds 41-43 CLOSELY: When Hillary returns from audience to desk the display is switched ON ( = from black to white)!
WATCH especially min 2:20 in this one: Lester Holt fixing his cable going down from his ear in the back of his suit.
In min 10:20 You see "the guy with glasses" bending and grabbing sth. What the producers did NOT notice: This was CLEARLY PLANNED. Why should they walk to the desk? The EXIT is at the RIGHT: Nobody can be mistaken. You walk the DIRECT WAY. The Clintons and the woman in black that steps close to the Clinons without any reason: They are ALL acting to BLOCK any view on the "guy in glasses"!
Trump PLAYED FAIR: You cannot detect anything wrong on his desk. Only papers, there. On Hillary's desk You do not only see the TELEPROMPTER. You see sth white the size and thickness of a TABLET. CLEARLY not papers!
After the debate You can see that the display has been removed: nothing white, nothing black there anymore.
RIGGED election 2016
Parts of these two videos - oh holy miracle! - were even shown on cnn.
Now You KNOW, now You can see it YOURSELF.
You do not want to accept what I tell You? CHECK! Watch the debate in the internet, in youtube, again! I am SURE You get my points, then.
Then cnn - and ALL the others! - cannot fool You, cannot manipulate You so easy any more.
(To be continued!)
Chances are
2016
can become one of the BEST years EVER! Why?
a) First of all one thing's for sure: America gets rid of that fool Barrack Obama. And: Even though Obama's gone the terrible nuclear contract with Iran will stay.
b) Hillary Clinton will continue to demolish herself. America will never be stupid enough to forget all her lies, the Clinton-Corruption, the Benghasi-Desaster. Hillary is GUILTY. Not only once. She MUST NEVER WIN!
c) Then America can vote in favour of Donald Trump. We will learn whether the USA do that. We will see whether America becomes G R E A T again!
d) The MODERN, the FREE and CIVILIZED world can get rid of IS, if we only take action decisive and determined enough. We CAN defeat IS, and we CAN seriously hit ALL militant holy warriors. And even the doubtful countries will fight by our side. Let's fight, and let US kill THEM BEFORE they kill us! WE WILL PREVAIL! We can even make Syria a peaceful, prosperous legal democracy. If we only atack the problem properly.
e) Chances are the champagne party can go on: Oil is cheap. cnn tells me that is bad for the world. And: Yes: I am concerned about the fracking industry being hit severely (Is the price war a war to kill fracking? I guess it is. But they will be back. They will make fracking cheaper.) Cheap oil is bad for oil producers. But it is good for EVERYBODY consuming oil. And these are MORE. A LOT MORE!!! As usual I do not buy what cnn wants me to buy.
f) The euro is still down. This is the strongest catalyst converter for european economy. Makes the products cheaper, and the companies. The interest rates are still low. So it is smart to borrow, smart to invest. Savings do still not pay. Stocks do pay. Even dividends.
g) If that Mrs. Angela "Angie"Merkel is not impeached she will still be there on Dec 31, 2016 and continue to do damage, to ruin the country, to be the most successful one-woman-demolition-show, to produce bills that the next generation will still be paying in 50 years. That's a desaster. Maybe Germany turns smart and sends her to hell where she belongs? Let's hope so and give it a 10%-chance. for good.
h) Sepp Blatter will not survive. If things go right he goes to jail. The swiss authorities will stop protecting him from justice.
i) I will survive. Again. Problem is in 365 days my golf will still be as bad as it is today.
I am STILL BULLISH.
But now to "The Donald":
Reason number O N E :
He's simply the best. And he does not only boast he's the best, like the others do. He has given P R O O F, the EVIDENCE that he is one of the SMARTEST men in the world, as a businessman. Nobody can be stupid enough not to see that.
Reason number T W O :
He is bloody R I C H! Meaning: NOBODY can buy him. There were rich Presidents before him. But none of these was FILTHY rich. All of them had to take money to run their campaigns. They OWED the big spenders. Favours. TRUMP is ABSOLUTELY INDEPENDENT. And everybody can see that EVERY day.
The BIG difference!
His business, his own LARGE aeroplane, his family, his campaign, his website: Paid for by Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.
Barrack Obama has "Air Force ONE", the aeroplane of the American President. The United States Of America pay for Obama's plane.
Trump does not need that. He already has "Trump ONE', and he pays for the plane himself ;)
The Clinons do not even have a small aeroplane. That's why they are in such urgent need to get the government's planes back in their hands. For free.
Reason number T H R E E :
He does not have that much reason to lie. He can be wrong, but he will NOT lie. Not to often, alright. There's not so much need for him to lie.
Hillary Rodham Clinton: the FACE of a BITCH, the FACE of CORRUPTION?
Let's face the FACE:
Payments of Goldman Sachs, from CEO Lloyd Blankfein only:
The (Hillary Rodham PLUS Bill PLUS Family members) Clintons' rewards:
- Hillary 675.000 US$ for "two speeches"
- Bill 1.550.000 US$ for "speeches"
- Clinton Foundation between 250.000 and 5 Hundred Thousand "for welfare" - of the Clintons'
- Chelsea Clinton's husband Marc Mezvinsky at least TWO MILLION US $ for his hedge fund "Eaglevale"
The fund, of course, went broke, 90% of the money is lost - for NOTHING
The assumption, that there are MORE MILLIONS that we do not know about is LEGITIMATE!
Hillary Rodham Clinton is NOT qualified to be president. She is NOT qualified for ANYTHING! She LIES, she BETRAYS, she's into CORRUPTION. And she has given and she gives proof that she's NOT qualified. She messes up.
I CANNOT believe she can fool the american voters. She tries to fool EVERYBODY, even the (FBI) investigators. I CANNOT believe she can get away with that. Especially since EVERYBODY can easily see her LIES. Even though I see EVERY day in cnn, in Fox News the fools she can still fool. This is SURREAL.
Now look at Hillary: Hillary Clinton MUST lie all the time. And EVERYBODY can see EVERY day that the moment she opens her mouth she is already lying. She is not smart, she's almost always wrong, and she lies all the time. She has NO chance to win. She cannot fool the american people any more. But she keeps on repeating all the time how tremendously good she is. Ridiculous.
Same with Fiorina. Of course Trump is right: even looking at her is a waste of time. She does not have the face of a president: looking into her eyes You see she is an empty greedy shell. You see she is eaten away by her greed, by her fanatic ambitions.
She sees a camera, and she starts talking. BlaBlaBla. You wait. You hope she could possibly say sth. She does not. You are disappointed. You feel You were wasting time. She's a zero. Don T knows that, too.
Reason number F O U R :
OK, then: even though she is not worth it: let us waste a little time on Hillary. She is her own worst enemy. Even though she did an awful job as secretary of state in the foreign office she had a fair chance to win the election. Now everything is in shambles.
The "Clinton Foundation ("Welfare") does primarily care for the welfare of the Clintons. They are not only involved in one but in COUNTLESS scandals about corruption. Many of their friends and associates are convicted criminals. You google "clinton foundation corruption"! Look for Haiti!
If they are searching for a name standing for corruption in the USA: Would that be "Clinton"?
She lies permanently until today her infamous role in the Benghazi desaster.
She cannot settle her e-mail affair any more: because the investigators already do that. And she carries on with lies, and more lies, and she tries in vain to fool the investigstors by manipulating the evidence.
Hillary says ALL the time: "NONE of my mails on that private server was classified." The investigstors say: "THOUSANDS of her mails contain classified material." And now YOU still trust her, YOU still believe her???
Putin is a KGB-man! What do You think the KGB does? It is the task of the KGB to break into foreign phones and computers. Do You think they are good enough, they have the skills to hack an unprotected private e-mail-server?
Here I show You how easy it is. mail-hacking procedure for dummies:
If You know her mail-address (You have to find it. Google. Search internet-information. Often these are being leaked to hackers. She sent tens of thousands of (some classified or confidential!) from this server. Meaning thousands of people had the address. Each of them could do it. Each of them could sell the address in a hacker-community.) You go to server-login, You enter the nick. Then You have to enter the password.
What password? You know Your password, how You chose it. Since we have a lot of problems with all the thousands of our passwords that we have to keep track with we tend to use simple ones that we can well remember. Plus we often use the same password for different sites. Both habits are a security-overkill. But so many even smart people do that.
Now the hack starts: You begin entering the most common passwords. You can download lists of these from the internet. Maybe You know already that this might start with: "123456", "qwerty", "password", and so on. Then You consider all publicly available information about Hillary, and You start entering "Hillary", "hillary", "Rodham", "Clinton", "secretary", "president", "mother", "mommy", and the names of kids and relatives. Chances are You might pretty soon find "bingo!", You are in: All her mails are on Your screen.
Believe me: there are many ways to do this that are MUCH smarter, MUCH more efficient, MUCH easier, MUCH faster!
Let me tell You: You look for access to a hacker-community. In IRC (I nternet R elay C hat), for example. IRC offers data You cannot find easily elsewhere. A hacker offers data. You are nice to him. He transfers to You.
You do not believe me? Read the news. Google "Holden Security". Because just these days this is what happenend. A russian hacker gave away 272 MILLION mail-addresses PLUS passwords. From Microsoft, Google, and Yahoo. From mail.ru. Chances are Hillary had her e-mail server on one of these. Which server did she use? One day we will read this in the news, too.
Or You just simply send her a message "Lose Your over-weight. Be slim in 6 months, buy our new successful body-lotion! Still eat all the chocolate You want." - with an attachment. "info.exe". She clicks it, she gets the information how to get the miracle-lotion. The app transfers all e-mails to You. PLUS every click of her mouse/keyboard.
And then: How stupid is she? She is NOT any silly housemaid. She is a lawyer. She has a university degree. And she was Secretary of State? Many lawyers I know are stupid. But be assured: Not many lawyers I know are as stupid as that!
-------------------------------------------
May 26 2016: Finally we know how she did it. I can hardly believe my eyes! It's even more S T U P I D than I could ever have anticipated: she did not call her mail-adress "sexyblonde@yahoo.de", or "laundrybag@gmail.com", NO. If she had chosen this nickname not anybody could know immediately it was her. No. She bought a top-level-domain and called it "clintonemail.com". Worst I ever heard of. This means she's in EVERY public domain-list, like in a telephone-book.
She could as well have placed commercials in cnn telling every enemy secret service: "Guys, I have a mail-server, the adress is "clintonemail.com", and the password is "hillypresi".
Not only secret services all over the world, yahoo and google have "bots", servers that incessantly scan the internet for public domains and e-mail-adresses. The automated procedures gather the useful info all the time.
Now we understand why the hacker who is now in court said that it was so easy to break into her mails.
Hillary Rodham Clinton's LIES are worse than the worst lieing bitch I have EVER heard of in the last SIXTY YEARS!
Hillary says ALL the time sth like: "Everything was permitted." , or similar. BLOODY LIES!
EVERY official being asked says: "She NEVER inquired. The procedures were not safe. She was told. The employees who hinted to the arising dangers were told by their bosses to shut up."
Hillary says ALL the time sth like: "I made a mistake. But I followed the legal rules." , or similar. BLOODY LIES!
EVERY official involveded says: "She did EVERYTHING to CIRCUMVENT the rules, the law."
Hillary says ALL the time sth like: "NO classified information." , or similar. BLOODY LIES!
First thing the institutions involved in the evaluation of the MANIPULATED mails she handed over was THEY HAD TO REMOVE CLASSIFIED information from the files made public. Even AFTER she and her STAFF CLEANED the files!
Let me put it this way: if I would only try to target 24 hours of Hillary's daily LIES I would be busy for a week.
This is NOT ONLY STUPID, NOT ONLY CRAZY, NOT ONLY WEIRD: this is SICK!
IF there is ANY REASON in the american legal/justice system, in the FBI, in any administrative office involved Hillary WILL BE INDICTED.
Even though we must not forget that it was the United States' legal system that let O.J.Simpson get away with murder. It was broadcasted LIVE all over the world when and how they did that!
Hillary is a SHAME to the Democratic party! How can they still support her? How can she still have followers? How can the Democratic party still support, still protect her?
Several reasons are possible: If she made more than 100 Millions US$ from corruption she might have given a lot to the party. Or they protect her because they know they lose everything if the TRUE dimension of ALL the Clinton-scandals shows up.
-------------------------------------------
But then: she could have had another well protected government-mail-server with just one phonecall. Instead of that she privately organised guys who installed the private server for her. Does NOBODY except ME ask: WHY did she do that? She CLEARLY had a reason!
One reason might be she wanted to avoid any government official to see the mails concerning the donations she recieved. She did not want them to see her confidential mails, the classified material.
And: e-mails. And: the blackberry. And: falsify. And: delete. And: edit. But most of ALL: L I E !
WHY is America OVERDUE to put her in jail - where she belongs? Because Obama protects her? How can Obama protect her?
I wrote the Obama-Question several months ago. In April 2016 it is CLEAR, it is in the news:
The present president of the United States of America Barrack Obama, the best friend of that "woman" in bags, Angela Merkel LIES to You, to the american public!
The women in bags: The most powerful bitches in the world?? Shouldn't they be in jail? Both? Lock them and throw the keys away!
Obama said ALWAYS: "I do NOT influence the FBI-investigation." "I do NOT protect her." But now it's in the news: The White House, President Obama withheld evidence blaming Hillary Rodham Clinton in the Benghazi-Affair.
Mrs. Hillary Clinton is a KNOWN criminal. Everybody who has news must know that. EVERY medium - TV, press, internet - gives EVIDENCE of her crimes. And there are still democrats, there are still Americans standing with her? How can they???
And of course Trump is RIGHT about the Congressman Weiner-Affairs. Weiner's wife is a personal aide of Hillary's.
Would You want to see this man's penis?
No problem: if You are a woman and You befriend Congressman Anthony Weiner in Twitter he might well send some pics of his dick. Better than this one. He used to do that. Several times. Publicly.
Hillary already commits political suicide herself. Every hour. The more she talks and lies the more she kills herself. And she does not even understand it. How could she? What she understands is her polls going down. We mention the known fact that many (most?) women have NO idea of politics. But they have the right to vote. They have the right to be lawmakers, congressmen, secretary of state. How do they vote if they do not understand politics? How can they be lawmakers, even secretary of state if they are not able to manage their kitchen?
They vote for looks: the handsome candidate. Or for gender: women think women understand women. Now Hillary is losing support of her female voters. Say the polls. So she emphasizes to her followers that she is fighting for feminist rights. Good girl, Hillary, lol. It does not help her.
But Trump is wrong with his timing: he should have waited to talk about the affair. If she should survive, this is good enough to throw her down. Later. Not now. To early. There was no need to disclose this already now. That's HOT ammunition. Right now not many even realized that. So: not now. Patience. The time to take even more advantage of this will come!
But there is sth else: In the recent broadcasts of her campaign I saw her on stage, every now and then, microphone in hand, arguing, shouting. This woman is not only full of lies.
I saw Hillary's face: This face is a face of HATRED. I am in SEVERE shock. This woman is scary.
This woman is not cool. She is not a woman who reasons. This woman is controlled by evil feelings, controlled by hatred.
But: Hardly any rule without exception: There is indeed fox news' remarkable, extraordinary "Judge Jeanine Pirro": Is she really the only woman in world-wide media who's got brains?
THANK YOU, Jeanine!!!! For: backbone, brains and balls, for HONESTY and for TRUTH!
This woman is NOT shrill, she is NOT shrieky, her voice is NOT high pitched.That makes the difference,
too.
Look at her, LISTEN TO HER!
She says: “How can the woman - who is under criminal investigation - who knows she’s under criminal investigation but lies to your face saying that she’s not – continue on her path to the white house?”
Jeanine Pirro is NOT part of the "(cnn) media's bitch branch" I am so worried about with the best reason.
Hillary Rodham Clinton is not only in a scandal. She is not only in to MANY scandals. She is not only a walking scandal:
Hillary Rodham Clinton is the MOTHER of SCANDALS, she is THE MOTHER of LIES!
Hillary Rodham C. has already done TO MUCH to do damage not only to herself:
Hillary has done DAMAGE to the NATION. A LOT of DAMAGE!
Hillary Rodham Clinton is a proven DANGER that already turned into actual deaths, a PROVEN SERIOUS RISK to VITAL american security interests! But she is the WOMAN cnn promotes! UNBELIEVABLE!
And now this same crooked Hillary Clinton tells us that the Donald is dangerous, that he is a risk? Assumed "danger / risk" stands against SERIOUS DAMAGE she already caused. Right?
And she carries on! In May 16 she says "My husband Bill Clinton will reviralize the economy when I am President. He knows how to do it." You got the points? This means she says Obama let the economy go down in such a bad way that it needs to be "REVITALIZED".
And it means Bill Clinton again gets more powers to "revitalize" the economies of these "Clinton Charity Foundations".
Donald Trump does not need a corrupt "charity foundation". He already has ENOUGH.
Reason number F I V E :
The media hate him, especially the politically correct fools at cnn. But it does not help them. The more they try to pee at his legs the more airtime they MUST give him - whether they like it or not. Because HE makes the pace, HE makes the NEWS, and the viewers want to see him, hear him, understand him. cnn can fight Donald Trump, but if they do not give him lots of time, more than any other candidate, the viewers will go to the news stations which show more of "The Donald".
The secret of success for TV-stations are viewing rates. And viewers ZIP channels. So: they show Trump, the viewers stick to the channel. cnn - even though they HATE Trump - they have no chance to ignore him. He FORCES them to give him airtime. Much airtime. If they don't the viewers go to ABC, or Fox. Or to CNBC - they like Trump - as long as they show him. Trump already wins the media-war, this way.
Let's look how smart cnn is: they host the second republican GOP ("Grand Old Party") presidential race debate in 45 hours from now on. 10 ( T E N !!!) Participants: Trump, plus x others hardly anybody knows. Already after the first debate cnn was FORCED to admit : "Nobody outshines Donald Trump." So WHY should they waste the time and the interest of their viewers by inviting 7 candidates or more who are way down in the polls, who already lost the race before it really starts to get warmer? Who is interested in these? Who is interested in "Carly" Fiorina??? WHY should Trump EVER discuss seriously with somebody like Fiorina???
So they do the show for 3 hours. And then one of the moderators apologizes that there were so many issues they should have adressed, but could not. Important issues. Lost. Because 7 losers wasted precious time. On location and with millions of viewers worldwide. Quantity instead of quality! Thank You for that, cnn. It was good I fell asleep. The cnn-anchor said: "My boss wanted it to be like this."
Reason number S I X :
He's a WINNER. Everybody can see that. Easily. This already makes his competitors LOSERS. The SECOND WINNERS are the FIRST LOSERS. Tough? Yes. That's life! But, NOW: is there anything MORE stupid in the universe than "Jeb" Bush calling Trump "a loser"??? Even if Trump should lose ALL THE TIME from now on (what he will not) he is still managing GREAT companies, GREAT projects. Even if he should lose always from now on he will still sit on BILLIONS of US$. How stupid is it to call a guy like him "a loser". WHILE the polls say that "Jeb" Bush was already COMPLETELY LOST for several weeks. A guy who has NO companies Trump-style, no reasonable projects? And no concepts, no plans?
Reason number S E V E N :
He does not use manuscripts for his speeches. He's talking free. So his speeches are never the same. The other candidates are readers. Their speeches are always the same. Trump does not work with paper. He works with his brain.
Reason number E I G H T :
I wanted to watch the second GOP debate on cnn on Wednesday. It was UNBELIEVABLE. I was right (see there!) The cnn-concept was TERRIBLY STUPID and WRONG. The first four of the candidates enter the stage. I've never seen them before, I do do not know them, and I do not need to know them. Same with the rest of another 5 charismatic bigshot-losers. I know Jeb Bush. But what for? He's already defeated. So WHY is cnn wasting my time with these?
Each of the four had the oppurtunity for an inititial statement. I expected to hear sth essential. The first who thought he had presidential quality stated he should be elected since he admires Ronald Reagan. (By the way: Ronald Reagan was there ALL the time - and not only because the stage was Air Force ONE, Reagan's presidential Boeing 707 - , they always quoted Reagan. Oh, I thought, most of the fools in Germany tell me that Reagan is/was just a silly Hollywood cowboy actor. And then there is so much enthusiasm and ADMIRATION in America for this extraordinary President. Without the slightest doubt Reagan had presidential quality. The guy who emphasized his respect for Reagan lacked that.
Then it was the second guy's turn. You will not believe me that this idiot told me he should be elected because he was "the proud father of seven." This was his essential message? I was DEEPLY bewildered.
Then these gentlemen started to argue - and I fell asleep. After 5 minutes, maybe. I wanted to see hear "The Donald". No chance to make it that long. Last thing I remember of this "debate" was that guy number two opting to win the battle by stepping forward and shout again: "... and I am the father of seven, and I...... " sth.
One day later I see short parts, now with Trump. Now I am glad I missed the debate. Trump talks on autism, a personal concern to him. The moderators want to make people laugh about Trump. One of the candidates, his name might be Ben Carson (?), seems to be a doctor. So they address him to get his view. He laughs, makes an ironic comment, calls "The Donald" "Dr.Trump". Auditory laughs. Then this Carson quotes scientific studies in a voice teaching the amateur Trump in a professional sense. Now You think he is giving evidence that Trump had no idea of what he's talking about? Sorry, You are WRONG. This guy AFFIRMED EVERY point of Trump's views. Trump is BAFFLED. He can only throw in: "This is PRECISELY what I said!" Nobody seems to get that.
Now WHO is this Ben Carson (?) ? A guy who pretends to fight Trump's point from above, from a scientific position, scientific knowledge versus media standards, doctor/expert versus amateur. And then he CONFIRMS every detail of Trump's argument? I can't believe it!
Carson could have said ONE intelligent sentence: "You are right, Mr. Trump, I agree." He did not say that. He wasted my life by explaining why Trump was wrong confirming that Trump was right. Crazy. Weird.
Then Carly Fiorina. She's not only an empty shell. Her face is a motionless mask from to much surgery. But that's not the real problem: the one of the real issues of "Carly" is: she does not laugh. Not with her face. Not with her words. Her eyes do not laugh. This is the REAL problem about "Carly". The only moves in that face are mouth and eyes. And in the person? In the whole 3-hours-event You do not see her smile only once.
I saw emotions only once in three hours. When she mentioned the tragic loss of her daughter who was addicted to drugs. I know what she is talking about. Even though I do NOT consider myself a drug-expert. Usually You should not mention this. She did. To emphasize her point that she is now an expert on drugs. I do not think she is. I think she has no idea, no clue. Only thing she knows is that the drugs her daughter took killed her daughter. And just to make the subject completely clear: most of the drug-problems I saw in my life were this way or the other connected to a kid's parents. You understand me?
MY point is different, and I am NOT sorry, Carly. First I think that the parents who do not consider themselves drug-experts but simply keep their kids out of drugs are smarter. Then: to understand the death of Carly's daughter we have to understand the Fiorina-family. Before we judge. So Carly'd better be more careful, less silly.
She tries to make points and to impress Trump by stating she ran Hewlett Packard in difficult times. Trump is clearly not convinced of her abilities. And he would not have one tenth of his fortune if he would not know the difference between a good and a bad manager. Does she not understand that she was only an employee? The kind of people Trump hired and fired all his life long? She could not even apply for a job at Trump's empire. The empire he built up himself. Not an employee. Entrepreneur, and Boss, and Owner. And one of the most successful ones. Is she so stupid? - Yes, she is.
Hewlett-Packard seems to think that Carly ran the company into difficfult times. You do not fire a manager that is doing a good job, do You?
Carly says she doubled some figures in HP. Well, what she actually did was make a merger that was later widely considered as one of the biggest mistakes in business history.
Now, what does Carly tells us? She tells us Trump had four bankruptcies. Trump says: "She's incompetent. That's why she was fired."
How can we find out the truth??? What we can see is that Carly's still fired. AND we can see Trump is NOT bankrupt. So, Carly, what the hell are You talkimg about????
If Fiorina were only half as good as she thinks she is Trump would have offered her a job right away, while on air. Regardless of her dead face. He did not.
Fox news TV spends a lot of effort in convincing their viewers that Fiorina was the winner in the debate. I cannot see that. She is the winner for cnn, too.
Looks a lot like we must realize that for fox news and for cnn the losers are the winners.
Now I ask YOU! WHO is Carly Fiorina?
Carly tells us she is a warm-hearted caring mother who mourns the tragic loss of her drug-addicted daughter. She tells us she is the hot-shot-top-manager. She tells us she is the best person who should be the next President of the United States of America.
What do You think? Is she?
Or is she the icecold career-woman who does everything to be on top? Who even sacrifices the care of her daughter to her career? Who instrumentalizes the death of her daughter for her political ambitions, who uses the death of her daughter as an argument to WIN the election debates?
WHAT do You think?
Reason number N I N E :
He's a businessman, NOT a politician. Most of the politicians we've seen during the last centuries until today were/are driven by evil, incompetent, stupid, corrupt, criminals, and/or all of this or whatever. We are SICK of the human trash that exercises power und rule our lives.
We had more than enough guys that had many ideas about politics, but no idea how to run a coubtry properly or even successfully.
Now the time has come to let a man, who is beyond doubt not only able to run a business empire, but to establish it. He knows what BILLIONS are, and he knows how to handle them. So let him do that!
Reason number T E N :
Body language can hardly lie. Everybody knows how to lie with words. One of the top performers is Hillary Clinton. Not many people are trained well enough to lie with their body language. Even though many politicians do try. Now listen and READ what one of the best experts says:
" - "When it comes to body language, nobody does it better," says David Givens, director of the Center for Nonverbal Studies in Spokane, Washington. "He just neutralizes the opposition." - "
This is really crazy: The first time in history a guy pays for his campaign himself. Hundred's of Millions, I guess. What happens? People do not only see but they UNDERSTAND that NOBODY can BUY Donald Trump, NOBODY can corrupt him. N O B O D Y !!!
So until now every campaign for presidency in the United States of America had to raise hundreds of MILLIONS of US$ to pay for the expenses. There were fund-raising events, parties, dinners, everything. There were lots of even small private donations.
BUT: the BIG money was there, too, always: If You give BIG money to a presedential candidate to promote his campaign You want several things: You want reputation (Pics with the President, dinner invitation to the White House, and such). You want YOUR candidate to win. And You want him to know he owes You some favours. A Casino-licence, for example. Classified information. Or else.
Trump says so, and he is R I G H T! Trump owes no favours to anybody because he does not need to take money from everybody.
News today - 9/19 2015: Repuclicans receive RECORD doanations!
Now WHAT the HELL is this? For the first time in history we have a presidential candidate who cannot be paid for favours. So You expect the money going to the GOP to go down sharply? You are wrong!
The REALLY rich business-tycoons, the international companies are giving EVEN MORE money to the Republicans than they ever did when the $ was still connected to favours!
Thank's to "The Donald". THIS is what I call "Trump-effect"!
Reason number T W E L V E :
Trump would NEVER give a job to:
Janet Yellen. Yellen is just awful. She scares the markets. Worst thing You can do! You have to give CONFIDENCE to the markets. Whenever she's on candid camera she tells us: "Things are so bad!" But they are NOT.
Hillary Clinton. Hillary is not only involved in one scandal, she is in MANY! These are not petite anecdote-scandals, like being caught in a silly sex-affair. Her scdandals are SERIOUS, BIG DEAL, ALL of them! But even more: she is not only under FBI CRIMINAL investigation in only one, but in TWO cases. And still democratic party does not care?????? She is still being protected? By her husband, her fans, the democrats, protected by Barrack Obama?
The Democratic party does not have the faintest idea - since Bernie Sanders is just a silly old lefty loser! - whom they will stand against Trump if Hillary Clinton is indicted: And she MUST be indicted - before election.
Then there is only one candidat left for presidency of the U S A: PRESIDENT "THE" Donald Trump, jr.
By the way: on this trip to german chancellor Angela Merkel Hillary Clinton's infamous blackberry-phone was being overheard by the german secret-service BND.
Madeleine Albright - (Nominated Secretary of State by Bill Clinton. A feminist. Both. Would anybody make the german feminist Alice Schwarzer Secretary of State? In the USA they did that! And not only her: Hillary Clinton, too. SHAME on the democrats for that! Because that is TERRIBLE!)
I know You do not believe me, but this woman said: "There's a special place in hell for women who do not help each other". She did not say "a space in hell". She said : "SPECIAL" place in hell. Meaning: not only "hell", but the worst corner in hell. This stupid chick is SICK chick, isn't it? Do we need to know more? I don't think so.
He would give them ALL the time to take sufficient care of A) F I R S T their CHILDREN and THEN B) of their families and C) cooking and cleaning the house. In the slight hope they are better doing that than they are in their jobs.
Trump hired competent people all his life long. You can NEVER move forward and get B I G if You associate with or employ fools. So You can trust him he will not forget how to do that in oval office.
Reason number T H I R T E E N :
His tax-concept. Not one of the other candidates has only a simple clue about a new tax-system. Trump has that. And he does not only have it: his new tax-system is G O O D !
Reason number F O U R T E E N :
He is right about "political correctness".
Reason number F I F T E E N :
He is right about guns.
Reason number S I X T E E N :
He is right about "global warming". The earth cannot exist without climate change, this is a natural phenpmenon. It is NOT caused by the sins of car drivers. Renewable energy does not work mostly, it is not efficient. We do not have batteries that are good enough for cars. And if we had them, we cannot produce enough energy with sun and wind. It does NOT work. The concept of wind/solar energy wastes billions.
Reason number S E V E N T E E N:
You can never reach sth great if Your goals are small. Presidency is not a job for the faint-hearted, for book-keepers or peanut-counters.
There's no doubt that Mr. Trump thinks B I G.
Reason number E I G H T E E N:
Mr. Donald Trump giving evidence again of his intelligence, reason, and KNOWLEDGE:
"Time" magazine made the german chancellor "person of the year"? Don't they know that "Angela Merkel RUINS Germany"???!!!
Reason number N I N E T E E N:
In cnn's GOP candidates discussion in Las Vegas Bush had to explain why he thinks he is better than Trump in dealing with Putin.
This means that Trump is already the man to beat, nobody else. Trump is the scale!
Trump does not have to explain why he is better: No way! The others might explain why they THINK they are better.
Reason number T W E N T Y:
Let's talk "Bernie" Sanders, now. Every second spent on "Bernie" is a waste of time. Even though I think he sells himself well. To me, it does not matter he is english, it does not matter he is a jew. To the american voter it does matter. Doesn't matter to anybody that "Bernie" is white.
The problem is: he is a fool. Most of the time - not: always! - he has no idea what he is talking about. Because he makes all his assessments, his judgements looking thru his socialist-red eyeglasses. So forget him: he will not win. Even though cnn promotes him desperately. As they do promote Hillary. Waste of time. Both.
BUT "Bernie" has a point: "Bernie" says: "Every newborn afro-american baby in the USA faces a ONE out of only FOUR chance to end up in jail." Now what does THAT mean?
"Afro-american" means: BLACK, the term "afro-american" is politically correct, only, and: maybe. Maybe not. We call that: "language-police", in Germany. "Bernie" is a clean-washed and rinsed politically-correct language-cop! All the lefties are good human beings, they are politically correct, they save everything, the salad, the animals, the forrests, the corals, the seas, the earth, and ther universe. So, their language is washed, and rinsed, and dried, it is clean, free of patriarchism, racism, discrimination, and other evils.
The blacks were negroes, in ancient times. Then they became "blacks", and they were proud of it "Black is Beautiful!" (slogan, 1970ies). Then this was considered an insult, by the language-cops. So we had to say "coloured", instead. Disregarding the fact that others were coloured, too, like indians, f.e. So language lost it's most important function, this way: to define differences. Then "coloured" was considered an insult, by the language-cops. I lost some steps, but I guess we have to follow "Bernie now, if we are good people, and we must say "afro-american". This is what precisely what George Orwell 1947 described in his book "1984". You got my point?
First it means that "Bernie" is probably not good in mathematics. Otherwise he would have said: 25 %. But maybe he thinks his voters are not good in mathematics, maybe they understand "1 out of 4" better. Then:
Second it means that the figures might be correct. Since "Bernie" is a senator, after all. He should know. But since he is a fool, too, his figures can never be considered unverified.
PLEASE DO BELIEVE ME: I am terrified about racism in american police. I am deeply concerned to see in TV every now and then how they shoot, how they kill people, NOT ONLY blacks!, how they beat and kick those who do not attack them, who turn their backs, who are kids, teenagers, women who are on the ground, helpless. This is TERRIBLE. And "TERRIBLE" is NOT good enough to qualify this!
But if his figures are precise it is terrifying: since this means that the american police going after the blacks is RIGHT, the racism has a serious reason in reality. This does not rectify and it does not even explain the killings, the beatings, the tortures.
But it means they have a BIG problem, they MUST work on that!
Reason number T W E N T Y O N E:
These days pope Francis felt driven to make another one of his infamous statements. He said it is not his business to interfere with US politics, with US elections. This is TRUE! So he better kept his mouth shut. But he didn't. He said:
pope: "A person who thinks about building walls instead of bridges cannot be christian".
hmmmmmmmmm .......... strange. Strange as usual, isn't it? What do WE think? We think "Oh, then several of the previous POPES CANNOT BE CHRISTIANS! Because they DID BUILD WALLS!"
Just to mention TWO: the wall around vatican city in Rome. And the wall POPES built around the jewish quarter in Rome. The vatican built this wall to separate the jews from social life in Rome, to put them in a ghetto, and keep them in there. The vatican built a CAGE for the jews.
jew abuse?
pope Francis fooling us! Yes. AGAIN! THREE LIES in only ONE sentence: Does this make "THE MASTER of LIES!"?
Does pope Francis think we are that stupid that we do not see, that we do not know this? Yes, this is PRECISELY what he thinks! And he is RIGHT: Because almost everybody buys his LIES. We do NOT!
Do not laugh! The vatican chose an area for the ghetto that was constantly flooded by the river Tiber. The wall had only 3 gates that had to be closed during nighttime. The jews welcomed the wall because they thought it protected them from CHRISTIAN MOBS (!!!!!!!!!!) Amen! And: HALLELUJA! LUJA, say I!
And, as ALWAYS, it's getting worse and worse: Should this mean that what Hitler finished with the holocaust in the 20th century was already fun-sport in Rome in the 9th century? CHRISTIAN MOBS going after the jews? I have to admit: I am NOT confused.
Oh, and the roman ghetto was NOT the only one. There were MANY italian ghettoes!.
The ghethoes were referred to in documents as Italian: serraglio degli Ebrei or claustro degli Ebrei, both meaning "enclosure of the Jews". HALLELUJA!
You did not know this? NOW You DO know.
Oh, oh: I guess mad Francis has a lot of problems now. PLUS the lie "I do not interfere." and in the same moment he does exactly that: Francis is speaking with the split tongue of the treasonous poisonous snake.
And the snake bites Donald Trump. And others. But this is not unholy Francis' point. He wants to discredit Trump. And this is precisely what the world understood. The message to the american faithful is: "Do NOT elect Trump. Because he is not christian." This is the message of a heel-biter, of a SNAKE.
By the way: Then many european politicians, first of all Angela Merkel, cannot be christians, too: since right now there are many considering walls and barb-wire-fences to protect their countries.
CNN religion analyst the Rev. Edward Beck says:
WOW! Now we finally got the difference! vatican: protection against frequent barbarian invasion. Trump says: protection against frequent illegal barbarian invasion plus criminals plus drugs.
So this lets the popes still be christians, but NOT Donald Trump jr.? oh oooooooooooooooh!
We are SO GLAD, that thanks to the vatican we now know the difference.
But okay: as always we trust the pope, we trust the vatican, we trust the catholic church. We buy that. Now we are only curious for their explanation of THEIR ghetto-cage for the jews. And their explanation for their papal fortress in Avignon, the "Palais des Papes"?
Or aren't we better NOT interested in ANY vati-explanations at all any more?
Got me?
I hereby and publicly request the catholic church, the vatican, the pope to SHOW us the bridges they built!
Really looks a lot like a HYPOCRITE, pope Francis, RIGHT?
I hope the american voter understands who is the traitor, here, and again. It is not Trump.
Two faces, again: papal snake?
Did he REALLY think: "Oh, sexy!"?
child abuse?
child abuse?
"The Catholic church’s position on corporal punishment came under sharp criticism last year during a grilling by members of a UN human rights committee monitoring implementation of the UN treaty on the rights of the child."
"In its final report, the committee members reminded the Holy See that the treaty explicitly requires signatories to take all measures, including legislative and educational, to protect children from all forms of physical or mental violence – including while in the care of parents."
A father and Francis: “One time, I heard a father in a meeting with married couples say ‘I sometimes have to smack my children a bit, but never in the face so as to not humiliate them’,” Francis said.
Pope Francis answered: "How beautiful.” he added. “He knows the sense of dignity! He has to punish them but does it justly and moves on.”
Reason number T W E N T Y T W O: He's getting BETTER all the time!
Reason number T W E N T Y T H R E E:
Stephan Richter, editor, "The Globalist": "It is as if the Clintons, despite 25 years in a harsh national spotlight, never learned the key lesson from the fall of Richard Nixon, the 37th U.S. President: the cover-up is always worse than the crime."
Stephan Richter, editor, "The Globalist": "It is this ill-conceived and politically inept strategy that the presidential campaign team surrounding Hillary Clinton is now running in 2016. The "crime" in question? Her lucrative speeches to Goldman Sachs."
Reason number T W E N T Y F O U R:
Did You notice that I hardly mention Ted cruz or Marco Rubio? They cannot win, they will not win. Every word about them is a waste of time. I saw already "Carly" Fiorina evaporate and Jeb Bush vanish in the infinite emptiness of the universe.
Rubio is a nice looking schoolboy who already starts sweating hours before he thinks he might be grilled. He is a naive fool. But not necessarily bad, dunno.
z
Ted Cruz is BAD. He lies, he manipulates. He says what he thinks the voter wants him to say.
I do not believe the american voters do not understand that. None of these two can match Trump.
Reason number T W E N T Y F I V E:
But just let Hillary carry on! Don't disturb her! She destroys herself. Better, and more efficient than her worst enemy. Because she is her worst enemy.
And I still do believe in the FBI-investigation. One day the FBI will move. Because they have to. Because they MUST indite Hillary.
So Hillary Rodham C. has to many STRONG odds against her:
All the Clinton-scandals of 30 years.
She should be in jail. So: even if the FBI does not indite her in time, the voter might understand that she is a danger to the country.
But then there is more: I now DO tell You, on March 6, 2016 that there is ONE question NOBODY asked until now:
It was a VERY stupid move to establish that private e-mail-server. Twice as much as she is a LAWYER with a university-degree. I have NEVER seen a lawyer act that stupid.
But she had a REASON to do that! Since she is VIP, former Secretary of State, Ex- First Lady, the wife of a president of the USA, she had EVERY right to ask for a solution for her needs. But she did not do that.
The BIG QUESTION is: WHY did she do that nevertheless, , despite a BIG BUNCH of SERIOUS RISKS?
She could have used the established servers that are there for governmental use.
March 6, 2016 I ask the BIG QUESTION nobody sees until now: WHY did she want that server? WHY did she want to BYPASS the governmental servers? WHAT did she INTEND to HIDE? WHAT is HIDDEN until today????
So let's not waste our time on her. We do not need to fight her.
She has 1 year to go before her blind admirers can put her thru the doors of POWER.
The FBI should not need one year to go. And the closer to the election the bigger the trouble the democrats are in. They might stand naked in the hot sun of the desert, without a proper candidate. Since the english jewish socialist "Bernie" (hoooow cute?) Sanders is certainly not the guy America wants to see in the Oval Office.
Reason number T W E N T Y SIX:
Trump is RIGHT about Rubio: Rubio has already lost. Everything. He cannot win anymore. The first one not to understand is Rubio.
March 2016: Rubio's history. So is Ted Cruz.
Reason number T W E N T Y SEVEN:
Trump is RIGHT considering the price and the structure of NATO.
DEUTSCHLAND JUBELT: Der Muslim Erdogan hat bereits in der Tuerkei die Meinungsfreiheit geregelt.
TRANLATION COMING
Die Tuerkei ist bereits in der NATO. Schmeisst Trump die da wieder 'raus? WIR WOLLEN Donald "The Donald TRUMP jr.! Erdi Erdogan kaempft um die Aufnahme der Tuerkei in die EG. Und noch BEVOR er "drin" ist, sorgt er sich jereits wieder um die Meinungsfreiheit. In der EG. Sobald er da Schlimmes bemerkt schaeumt er. Und wird unverschaemt. Weil Einer einen Witz gemacht hat, der keiner war. Da ist dann SOFORT Schluss mit lustig.
Das darf er. Und das muss er. Denn es geht ja schliesslich um das Reich seines gottes. Und um gott Erdogan. Wer sich ueber Erdi lustig macht beleidigt schliesslich gott.
Wie auch sonst, mache ich, wo immer moeglich, den reality-check. Damit die" mich nicht ... hmmmm ... verarschen koennen.
(literarisch korrekt sollte ich hier vermutlich irgendetwas schreiben wie zB. "Damit es Menschen, die mich mit fragwuerdigen Informationen in ihrem Sinne indoktrinieren wollen - so wie ich das hier mit Ihnen mache? - , NICHT GELINGT.)
Dafuer habe ich bei meiner ersten Landung in Istanbul exakt 2 Minuten benoetigt, und fast Alles war klar. Danach musste ich keine Zeitung mehr lesen. Die Tuerkei hatte sich mir bereits fast KOMPLETT erklaert. OBWOHL ich der Mutterzunge des Kuemuel Uezyguen nicht maechtig bin. Und das geht SO:
Smartphone 'raus, Aeroplane-mode "off", Radio "on", scan. 45 Sekunden spaeter: gescannt. Dann schalte ich die empfangenen Sender durch. 70 Sekunden spaeter wusste ich Bescheid:
Weil: Auf der ganzen Skala KEIN englischsprachiger Sender zu finden ist. Und KEINE Popmusik. (Womit wir beim deutschen wdr waeren - das an anderer Stelle!)
- Die "Rolling Stones" (Durchschnittsalter 71,5 in 2016) haben just Havanna gerockt: "Sympathy for the devil".
Zum ersten Mal nach Fidel Castro's verbrecherischer Revolution, die ein ganzes Volk zurueck in die Steinzeit stuerzte. Der moribunde Castro wuetet aktuell dazu, waehrend er so gut wie im Sarg schnuffelt, in den er bereits vor 60 Jahren gehoert haette, waehrend andere Leute John F. Kennedy, einen Mann der FREIHEIT, erfolgreich da hinein brachten, auf dem Weg nach unten ist: "„We don't need the empire to give us presents.“ " - Sie wissen, dass die HEUTE NOCH ihre Aecker mit Rindern und Holzpfluegen bearbeiten?). Weil Rockmusik fuer Kommunisten vom Leibhaftigen gemacht und somit des Teufels ist.
Stattdessen in Istanbul zu 100% BlaBlaBla a la shriekshriekquengel und Moscheen-Suren-Schrebbel-Singsang. Den ich manchmal privat FREIWILLIG hoere: weil es gute Musik gibt. Ungeachtet des religioesen Polit-Humbugs.
Das war der realtiy-check. Ergebnis: ich befinde mich im Islam-Staat, und TOTALER Medienzensur. Und in einem Land, das minimalen Anforderungen an Rechtsstaatlichkeit nicht genuegt. Das GENUEGT. Capsice?
"VERSTEHEN" bedeutet AUCH: Passt NACH realitycheck das Bild? Wir WISSEN, dass Erdogan Oel von ISIS kauft. Wir wissen, dass der NATO-Partner Erdogan den Russen einen Jet weggeschossen hat, mit dem die ISIS angegriffen haben.
Wir WISSEN, dass Erdogan an ISIS Waffen liefert, und dass er sich von Angela Merkel dafuer bezahlen laesst, die von ISIS Vetriebenen in der Tuerkei zu dulden. So dass er wieder mehr Waffen fuer ISIS kaufen kann.
Hat das bereits genuegt, um den MACHTmenschen (Maenner sind GROESSER! Mensch, also!) putin (klein geschrieben, damit's passt) auf die Knie zu bringen? Waehrend fast die ganze Welt erzittert und sich in den Staub wirft, wenn putin mit den Ketten rasselt? Trump: Ich werde mit putin ANDERS VERHANDELN!
Hat ISIS durch Erdogan's Abschuss putin BESIEGT? Da war ja auch noch der Abschuss einer russischen Passagiermaschine durch ISIS in Aegypten. Haelt der russische zwerg sich deshalb jetzt in Syrien zurueck? Ist putin auch nur eine Eierschlange? Kennedy hat Chruschtschow (links) mit HAERTE und ENTSCHLOSSENEM HANDELN im Handumdrehen klein gekriegt ("Kuba Krise"), BESIEGT!
Hat Erdogan uns jetzt erneut gezeigt, wie man mit Russland verhandelt? Damit diesmal ISIS gewinnt?
REALITY - CHECK!!!!!!
Nicht neu ist, dass Russland gegnerische Spionageflugzeuge (Gary Power's U2 am 1. Mai 1960. Mit Einschraenkungen: Russland konnte die U2 erst abschiessen, als sie wegen Triebwerksdefekt Hoehe und Geschwindigkeit verlor.) abschiessen kann.
Foto: picture alliance / ASSOCIATED PRESS
--- Powers wurde spaeter, am 10.Februar 1962, auf der Glienicker Bruecke gegen den Spion Karl-Heinz Abel und einen biederen Studenten am Checkpoint Charlie ausgetauscht. Das wird thematisiert im aktuellen Hollywood-Streifen mit Tom Hanks in der Hauptrolle, von Steven Spielberg, "Bridge of Spies". Sehr sehenswert. ---
Auch ohne Leistungsverlust abschiessbar hingegen waren fuer die Russen zivile "Spionage"-Passagiermaschinen, etwa die Boeing 747-230B der Korean Air Flug 007 westlich von Sachalin.
THIS is one of the BEST, and one of the easiest reasons: Look at the cons, the contras, the anti-Trump-people, and You should immediately understand that it is RIGHT to be PRO-TRUMP!
You only have to see the people who hate him und listen to their arguing and You know it is RIGHT that You like him!
You see this people worshipping a criminal lieing bitch and her hate-speech, You see them demonstrating, protesting on the roads, and You see the worst fools in cnn and fox news trying to damage his reputation, to tell lies about him. The liars often fail, they cannot betray many of their viewers. That's why they keep supporting Trump.
Just to call only one of the WORST cnn-lies into Your memory: He is NOT anti-immigrant. He is NOT Anti-Latino.
He has foreign roots himself. His wife is not genuine american.
But he IS anti-illegal immigrants, anti-criminals, anti-drugs.
This means the guys who hate him are pro illegal immigration, pro drugs, pro criminals. The mexican president knows that TONS of drugs are coming from his country into The USA, crossing his border. And he calls Trump the "worst Gringo". And cnn gives him audience for this nonsense again and again.
You got it?
So these lies are so stupid. But that does not stop cnn.
Reason number T W E N T Y N I N E:
In May 2016 cnn wants to make us believe that the GOP is looking for an alternative to Donald Trump. What the hell is that?
The GOP has a real winner as their presidential candidate. He easily outsmarted his admittedly mediocre republican competitors, be it Bush, Rubio, silly Kasich, that unspeakable Fiorina, or questionable dubious savory fool Ted Cruz.
Cruz was the guy, just to remind You, who consistently told the world that Donald Trump's a loser. While Trump is not only sitting on a couple of Billions. He not only has his private jet: he has the biggest one. "Lying Ted" was not only losing states, he was not only losing his own state, he lost everywhere, while Trump won. How can a loser then call his triumphant superior a loser? We let this be Ted's best kept intellectual secret.
Then when everybody could see that he lost everything he announced Carly Fiorina who already lost everything too his vice-president to be. I was rolling on the floor laughing. For two days.
And then, only 2 days after I started laughing he dropped out completely. And this fool wanted to be President of the USA?
Trump is that man with the balls to beat any lying scandalous incompetent corrupt bitch whose best skills are incorporating the whip woman, the woman for bitches.
Now cnn seriously thinks we are stupid enough to believe the GOP could be stupid enough to try to exchange a known winner with somebody that cannot even be seen anywhere until today?
Reason number T H I R T Y:
Sometimes it is good to judge a man (person) by looking at his enemies. If You see the mob rallying the Trump-campaign, attacking Trump-supporters, visitors of his conventions, throwing stones at the police, trying to run down barricades
Then You should understand that Mr. Trump should win, not the mob!
Reason number T H I R T Y O N E:
Ronald Reagan - whom the pink-red german lefties called "just a stupid actor" , since they HATED him - was one of the best presidents ever: because he did not only write american history in the best sense, he wrote WORLD HISTORY.
Reagan not only made America greater, he made the world GREATER!
Not only his tax-reforms promoted prosperity.
His PUBLIC REQUESTS to the communist Soviet Union, to russian President Gorbatschow, "to OPEN the IRON CURTAIN, to tear it down", to "Open the gates!", to "Tear down the Berlin wall!" are unforgotten, and unforgettable.
Now Mr. President to be "The" Donald Trump will have his chance to make America GREAT AGAIN.
Mr. Reagan should already have his statue in Washington. Mr. Trump might follow up. Not because he pays for it. Because it will be given as a gesture of HONOR.
Reason number T H I R T Y T W O:
WHY should Trump challenge "Bernie" Sanders? "Bernie" is not a challenge, he is just a silly old leftie, just another loser. Seriously challenging a guy like him is just a waste of time.
ESSENTIAL lesson learned in my life: NEVER have an argument with an IDIOT!
An IDIOT knows NOTHING! An IDIOT understands NOTHING!
An IDIOT has NO idea what he is talking about! An IDIOT has NO idea what You are talking about!
Trump MIGHT challenge "Bernie" to do that (?) because it might be SMART! Since this will give Trump a great forum, a good show, lots of attention. Trump will look BETTER and STRONGER in the debate than before. "Bernie" feeling flattered and already requesting the biggest arena plays into Trump's hands another TRiUMPh-CARD!
Reason number T H I R T Y T H R E E:
Just another triumph - or should I write T R (i) U M P (h) ? - of REASON, KNOWLEDGE, INTELLIGENCE and TRUTH: Trump will back out, he will CANCEL the Paris climate deal. That's GREAT, again.
Because that deal is silly, it is stupid.
Smart people KNOW: man does NOT cause climate change, man is nor guilty nor responsible neither can he stop or influence it.
Since only the UNIVERSE can. Climate change is part of the earth's existence since the beginning of earth time. Without the earth permanently und consistently changing climate ("ice ages"!!!!) we would not exist.
And we will stop existing because of that. Because it is not in the power of man to stop the sun from running out of burning power. From dieing. The dieing sun will first barbecue and then eat the earth.
Reason number T H I R T Y F O U R:
Mr. TRiUMPh will PREVAIL because until now he is the ONLY MAN STANDING, the only one who is HONEST.
His opponents make this race so unfair, so dirty. Hillary is either misleading or LIEING whenever she opens her mouth.
The VIOLENT PROTESTS at his campaign locations are being PAID. It is UNBELIEVABLE.
The mob gets 15 US $ per hour per head, PLUS free transportation. Plus more freebies. The money is PAID by followers of Bernie Sanders.
While good old Bernie accuses Trump of corrupt campaign financing. Is that a JOKE??? Or is it Bernie's modern times?
And they are being PAID by George Soros: He hates "The Donald" TRiUMPh jr. and his success as much as Ted Turner does!
This is the moment NOW that Mr. Trump should place a phone call to George Soros and teach Soros a lesson. Trump should let Soros know that he will be after him!
cnn does NOT tell You that. Fox News does NOT tell You that. Because they are misleading, they are manipulating You, too. Associated Press AP tells You. Washington Times' Tammy Bruce tells You. I DO TELL You!
Reason number T H I R T Y F I V E: WHO runs the smear campaign!
MANY participants run a SMEAR-campaign against Donald Trump. You can easily identify them: because they are accusing him of running a smear campaign, with lies and misleading statements.
The most significant ones: cnn and google. Google? YES! Google!!!!!
Google stands by the side of the criminal LIER Hillary Clinton. unbelievable, BUT: true!!!!
nbc accuses Trump to be a lier in regard of the Clinton (foundation) corruption. But Trump only QUOTES the book of Peter Schweizer "Clinton Cash". They do NOT attack Schweizer and his book. They attack Trump, they say these are his lies.
Until now neither Hillary nor Bill Clinton took Schweizer to court. And they have lots of lawyers, Hillary's a lawyer, Bill is. Bill is not allowed to work in the job any more: he lost his accredition.
The Clintons do NOT blame Schweizer to be a lier. Until they win the case in court we have EVERY reason to think Peter Schweizer tells the TRUTH about the Clinton corruption.
So it is clear Schweizer probably tells the truth. Then NOBODY can legitimately call anybody who QUOTES Schweizer a lier. This is what NBC does.
Now back to google: Like cnn google does manipulate You. The first step is the "auto completion". You look for "Hillary crime" or "Clinton crime". After You entered "Clinton cri" the auto-completion already tried to lead You away to "Clinton crisis" or such. They stopped that in the meantime.
The Clintons do NOT blame the film adaptation of the book by Stephen Bannon. The documentation will be shown in America on July 24 2016, just ahead of the Democrat's convention in Philadelphia.
But if You search "Clinton Cash" the first result You get is the lieing feature of NBC. Easy to detect: Just below is the quite reliable "wikipedia". Go there and You see NBC is smearing on Trump, not the other way round. Google features the NBC campaign!
The point is: Trump makes his money with real estate. The Clintons make HUNDREDS of millions being paid by America's enemies.
We already disclosed the violent protests against Trump as being paid for by followers of Bernie Sanders, and by George Soros.
Reason number T H I R T Y six: coming up!
But: Donald Trump needs better advisors, too. Because HERE are the subjects where he is wrong. And not only wrong: TERRIBLY WRONG!
REMARK regarding his advisors: If You see and hear Mercedes Schlapp, for example: No matter how good her arguments may be: she's already lost when she starts. Her body language and her especially high pitched voice sends the message that she is desperately defending Trump. That's terrible! FIRST she must learn to lower her voice. The message must be: we are right. We have the better arguments. We are strong. We are self-confident. (We do NOT have to defend our positions.)
Because he does not know better. That's not good enough.
In so far as wikipedia diverts from my point of view I do NOT rest my case!
Don't You see that no pope until now took care of the victims. The policy is: "I am terrified. I pray for You. And now: "Go away. Fuck off."
Do You know ANY company, organisation, institution anywhere in the world thru HUNDREDS of years with a significant history of SEXUAL ABUSE of CHILDREN that only comes close to that of the CATHOLIC CHURCH?
child abuse cover up
Understand! The cover-up is done by high-ranking-officials in the Vatican (bishops, cardinals, pope) who are not necessarily child-abusers themselves.
You need more? You get more! But if this is not already enough to cut all Your engagements with the catholic church You have to ask Yourself whether sth is seriously wrong inside Your head.
It is an ABSOLUTE MUST for EVERYBODY to KNOW about ALL that!!!!!
So it is a MUST for You to see the BEST documentation, one of the most important films of the last decades, the REMARKABLE "SPOTLIGHT". Nominated for Oscar and Golden Globe. It, NO!: THEY should have BOTH!!!! They already have several international awards. And even more public attention. Film is coming to German cinemas on Feb 25 2016. Of course I have already seen it. Of course I know PRECISELY what I am talking about. As usual!
Those who read und understand me can already anticipate the reaction of the vatican:
"No comment!" on one hand. "We appreciate the good work that has been done by the "Boston Globe" that has helped us, the church significantly in our eternal fight against sin and in our restless work against the devil." Third: Nothing will change. Case filed. The action goes on UNCHANGED! "But the "OSCAR" goes to "SPOTLIGHT"!"
Aren't THEY the DEVILS???"
I wrote long ago: Don't You see that no pope until now took care of the victims. The policy is: "I am terrified. I pray for You. And now: "Go away. Fuck off." This is the way they do it worldwide for HUNDREDS of years. That's still the way it is, in 2016. And it will be in the future.
THIS is what they do, what they've always done, what they always will do: Minimize the fuss. Silence. Do not feed the troll! If You have to: You admit, You confess Your sins. Publicly. One sentence. That's it. Then You carry on.
- "abuse" sounds nicer than "FUCK", and "children" sounds nicer than "YOUR children", doesn't it? So we would NEVER say: "HUNDREDS of PRIESTS FUCK YOUR KIDS!", would we?
"According to the president of the Catholic Bishops Conference, Archbishop Orlando Quevedo in 2002, about 200 of the country's 7,000 priests may have committed "sexual misconduct" - including child abuse, homosexuality and affairs - over the past two decades. "
Is this a LIE, again?
To me, this sounds RIDICULOUS!!! 200 clergymen in child abuse PLUS homosexuality PLUS affairs? This is CLEARLY a LIE. As usual. They NEVER say the truth.
In Boston 6% of the clergy abused children. Known cases. At least! If this refers to the Phils there are 420 priests involved. PLUS "dark" figures. (What is "dark" if the official figure is already a dark figure?
So the philippine media who ALL lick the feet of the holy devils better look for 420 cases. PLUS gays. PLUS affairs.
Now: IF each of these rapists of kids abuses ONLY 40 kids in - let's say: - 40 years, making ONLY ONE abused kid per year (ridiculous, too?) we have 17000 victims per generation. But: about ALL known, documented cases show not only one child per year, but lots of!
PLUS: Did Archbishop Orlando Quevedo and his brothers turn up in the meantime to tell the public how many of these criminals are in jail NOW? And if not: WHERE are they???
I cannot see that only ONE of the "smart" philippine investigative journalists is telling us!
TENS of THOUSANDS of cases? TENS of THOUSANDS of witnesses? No convictions, ZERO, still in 2016? Nobody jailed? Did the cleric hand over only ONE priest to justice?
I don't think they did.
holy wars/crusades
inquisition
money laundering - Vatican Banks (IOR, Banca Di Roma, and ALL the others)
The scandals around the IOR, the "Istituto di Opere di Religione", vulgo "vatican bank" are too many to mention here. Let's look at their latest joke: The vatican bank says it holds 5 Billion euro in assets. The australian cardinal Pell says, in the name of the vatican, the bank holds 1.5 billion euro BLACK MONEY in HIDDEN ACCOUNTS. They admit the falsification of all their balance sheets.
Now: What do we think? Do we think that we would have a hard time finding any other bank in the world that is SO DEEP in the DIRT? Is there any other bank in the world that EVER had to confess that one third, 30% of it's assets are illegal money, hidden in black accounts? Sounds pretty unique, doesn't it?
I tell You what I think: They are still lieing, they are still covering up. Things are worse! Much worse! They were always.
WHO goes to jail? Nobody. Except silly Scarano. Because they needed to sacrifice a pawn.
They enthroned the man who was the first to really be "God's Banker": Bernardino Nogara.
Understand! MoneyVal is the European Community's (EC) control commission for banks. They can go into any bank in Europe. They cannot go into the Vatican because of Autonomy and diplomatic immunity. Essentially the only one to control the IOR is the IOR. They found a way to "convince" the Vatican to let them in. The appointment they got was made weeks earlier. This makes clear they only saw prepared files. Same game as with Iran and the control of nuclear facilities. Smart contract, Mr. Obama.
Under Nogara the vatican held stakes of (italian) weapon manufacturers. Are they still engaged today? Then:
international weapon deals
involvement in Holocaust
fraternization with Mussolini
fraternization with Adolf Hitler
bishops, cardinals, priests turned Nazis
The church handed over their baptize registers to the Nazis. So the Nazis could immediately see who was catholic. And who was not, who was jewish.
Understand! Not ONE organisation: ALL of them! The roots are - as mostly! - hundreds of years ago in Vatican history.
Vatican Prostitution Rings, Gay Networks, and Blackmail
homosexuality
baby theft
Understand! There are AT LEAST two different aspects of baby-theft. Several popes authorized/committed (forced) baptizing of jewish kids to turn them catholics. They "rectified" this saying the jewish parents were abusing their children. Then: Right now in Spain: "A recent investigation has revealed a number of secret networks of nuns, priests, doctors, and nurses who conspired to steal as many as 300,000 Spanish babies. Over the course of at least five decades, many Spanish hospitals, often run by the Church, told mothers that their children died during or after childbirth. If the mothers insisted on seeing their babies, they were often shown an infant’s corpse. The babies were then spirited away for adoption by “approved” families. In some cases, they were sold to childless couples for large sums. "
celibacy
sick weird sexual doctrines
censorship
blasphemy
Understand! If You are in command of a criminal organisation that is necessarily full of lies: What do You do? First You do not want people to find out. So You blacklist media/books, whatever, that You do not want the faithful to read. Because these tell the truth, they uncover the lies. Then You accuse the heretics of blasphemy, so You can fight them, torture them, kill them. Got it?
"Mother-Teresa"-S C A M
Then there is so MUCH MORE!!!! The vatican's mother-Teresa- scam for example. 650 million US$ donated for her missionaries. Nothing arrived there. Somebody should pass the knowledge to Mr. Trump!
Understand! What the canadian scientists in Montreal brought together was NOTHING NEW, NOT AT ALL. It was already known during Teresa's lifetime. The church did not care. Because they wanted the scam. The swedish Nobel prize Committee did not care. They do not care until today.
Problem is: The Huffington Post is in Error: NOTHING new about that! These facts were already known by those with better informations in the 1990s BEFORE she died in 1997.
Please DO UNDERSTAND: There is no doubt that this is movie-evidence of her own genuine hospice in Calcutta. You can clearly see in the pictures, that there is NO money in that place. You do not need the story, You only need Your eyes! So WHERE are the 650 MILLION US$ the church collected with the mother-Teresa-SCAM????
"Shroud of Turin"- a S C A M, too, of course!
Torino - gravelinen. You do not even need scientific carbon dating that says this is to be dated in MEDIEVAL PERIOD! So it is NOT POSSIBLE that this is the cloth jesus was wrapped in in his grave! NOT POSSIBLE! !!! A LIE !!!
If You only use Your own eyes, Your own brain (given You got more than 3 grey cells): then You know You can wrap Your hamburgers for the rest of eternity and You will NEVER get a picture of the Big Mac. You know that, don't You? And the vatican is telling us this is NOT a lie, NOT a falsification, NOT a painting but the real print of jesus in his death, 2000 years ago!!! And You do not even need to know there is already documented in 1389 that an HONEST man, a bishop complained to the pope that the shroud is FALSE, a FALSIFICATION, BETRAYAL.
Now YOU judge Yourself: Is this the print of a dead body, or is it a painting? Congrats! You got it!
You think that's it? You are WRONG, most probably!
The churches, the religions are FULL of ENDLESS lies!
Only a handful of the uncounted victims of permanent child abuse in the catholic church who were to loud in public received active restitution. The rest got NOTHING.
The offenders on the other hand got protected, active protection by their bosses, the popes. They were just transferred to another community. Many if not most of them started abusing the children of the faithful immediately again. First they fuck the faithful, then they screw their kids.
There is NO, not even ONE priest, cardinal, bishop, pope in church tradition of worldwide sex abuse of the children of the faithful over hundreds of years who went to jail. NOT ONE.
If somebody would abuse children and You get knowledge: What would You do? Would You stay silent, would You do nothing? No. You would pass Your knowledge to the police immediately.
The church does NOT do that. They protect their priests. There is NOT ONLY ONE known case that the church turned over evidence to the police. They do NOT do that. Because they protect the OFFENDERS, not the victims.
And if the candidate's advisor did not READ and UNDERSTAND the book "God's Bankers" by Gerald Posner he is not qualified. Perhaps Posner should have the job!
One of the major eternal permanent lies of all popes is Pius' dogma "The desire for money is the root of all evil." - Says somebody who knows BEST.
Meaning:
Public church/vatican/pope LIE: church doctrine "money is evil". REALITY: unrestricted use of all (legal and illegal) means of economy/money markets to make P R O F I T S
All popes sing the song of noble poverty. All popes spent money regardless how much for their palaces, for their luxury. The bishops, the cardinals, the pope: they sing the song of poverty "blessed are the poor". But they live like kings. And they take the last peso from the poor if they can get it in their greedy hands.
The german Franz-Peter Tebartz-van Elst (You google him!), Bishop Bling Bling - pars pro toto: one standing for EVERY bishop, for EVERY cardinal!
He spent 70 Million US$ for the renovation of his home. 25.000 euro for a conference table, 15.000 euro for a bathtub. the long list goes on like this! Pope Francis took him out of the fire for a year, then rewarded him with a powerful and well paid position in the vatican. He had 11.000 euro income a month as bishop of Limburg. PLUS free living, ALL expenses paid, luxury home, luxury cars, driver, luxury travels, whatever. I guess he makes 500.000 US$ a year now in the vatican, this way. TAX FREE! 100% PROFIT, no deductions!
If You want to drink FIRST CLASS, if You want to dine FIRST CLASS, if You want to live FIRST CLASS: Join the catholic church!
You see: in the Philippines You can see at any time the church taking the pesos from starving children. What You do NOT see is the church giving rice to the poor. And as everywhere else in the world they admit their sins of living in luxury every now and then, promising to change to the better. But they NEVER do. They only admit and apologize again.
The essence: the churches, the religions are NOTHING without their lies, without the money the faithful give them for good: for THEIR OWN good. The poor get nothing.
Number two: He is WRONG about the muslims.
Modern times, modern civilization ...
versus ancient times - 2000 years - NO progress in civilization (except for the plastic shoes)!
Somebody should pass the information to "The Donald" that it is essential part of the muslim religion to enslave women. They have NO rights. They are being beaten and raped. If a housemaid, a woman who has been raped by her employer in Saudi Arabia and she tells police nothing happens to the man. But the woman goes to jail.
The list of other imminent problems to islam is endless. Somebody should update Mr. Trump on that.
That's why this Ben Carson has better polls now. Because he is RIGHT about the muslims. He KNOWS.
NO muslim anywhere in the world should be in a parliament, congress, government position: because they are NOT qualified. These people are driven by insanity, NOT by reason. All of them. Even those of them who are peaceful.
I hereby advise Mr. Trump to make Mr. Abdel-Samad his advisor regarding islam!
Abdel-Samad KNOWS, he says: Islam is FASCISM. And that's RIGHT. Because it is!
He is not only muslim, he is the son of a Muslim Sunni Imam. So he knows BEST!
Number three: Several weeks later Trump starts to understand about the muslims. Because he read ME here. But now he exaggerates. Since he does not understand german, I guess, he could not get the point I explained on my page "Willkommenskultur"
"welcome-culture" means: The german chancellor Angela Merkel invites all the poor people in this world to come to Germany so the german taxpayer can afford and pay for their better life without work. Then she pays several billions to Turkey's prime minister Erdogan, who himself pays hundreds of millions to islam militants IS!!!, to make him stop the refugees from proceeding to Germany.
Now Mr. Trump wants to stop ALL muslims from entering the USA, even his business-partners. He is not worried about his business with Saudi Arabia. Because his point does not change anything. For them he is the white unfaithful devil before, anyway. I'll have to translate that for him, here! Wait a bit, please! I will do that.
Reason number THREE:
Mr. Trump says "EVERYBODY knows there were no chemical weapons in Iraq." I guess he is wrong.
If somebody says "EVERYBODY knows" I am suspicious, and careful. So I go and google. And I find maps of chemical weapons sites in Iraq. Now ISIS says: "We have chemical weapons." And they had some of Hussein's depots in Iraq.
And then there is Ali Hassan al-Majid. Trial for mass murder. He said: " I will kill them all with chemical weapons! Who is going to say anything? The international community? Fuck them!" Then: " I will not attack them with chemicals just one day, but I will continue to attack them with chemicals for fifteen days." And that's what he did. He was convicted to death FOUR times, then executed for mass murder. He was hanged in 2010.
So HOW can anybody say Saddam Hussein did NOT have chemical weapons? I have NO idea.
USA can be the No.1 energy producer! Illegal immigrants "We want people to be in our country legally." - "many gang members are illegal imigrants.". Political correctness. Climate change. The "nuclear deal" with Iran might be the most stupid contract ever?
Reason number T W E N T Y O N E :
He says he's faithful, he is a presbyterian. He likes the pope. People hate atheists - I KNOW that!!!! They love the believers. He is wrong about the pope, about being faithful. But it will bring him the votes of those who are wrong about that, too.
Reason number O N E : More to come. I work on it.
Reason number O N E H U N D R E D T W E N T Y S E V E N:
The STRONGEST reason: EVERY criticism, EVERY insult of his competitors, the losers, is a COMPLIMENT for him. Because they think they are smart - but they are NOT. He's SMARTER. Even though they do not understand what is happening: They FEEL for sure they cannot cope. They cannot win this. They are already wasting the money of their sponsors.
- Hillary 675.000 US$ for "two speeches"
child abuse?
child abuse?
