Vatican a criminal organisation?

child abuse

Right now EVERYBODY who has eyes to see and a little bit of brain to think:

The pope LIES about child-abuse. And EVERYBODY can see that. I mean that "god weeps about the victims"-crap.

You cannot claim innocence any more after You read this! - wikipedia

In so far as wikipedia diverts from my point of view I do NOT rest my case!

Don't You see that no pope until now took care of the victims. The policy is: "I am terrified. I pray for You. And now: "Go away. Fuck off."

---

Und dann der australische archbishop cardinal Pell. Der Mann, den Papst Franciscus nach der Entlassung des deutschen Freyberg zu seiner rechten Hand und zum Chef der Vaticanbank gemacht hat. Weil der, dem australischen Fernsehen 9news zufolge ein LUEGNER ist, der bereits erfolgreich bis zum heutigen Tag Vertuschungsarbeit leistet in Sachen Kindesmissbrauch? Und der den Kinderschaender "Vater" "Father Ridsdale" ins Gericht begleitete. (sein Neffe David Ridsdale, der selbst als kleiner Junge Opfer seines Onkels wurde, und der damals bei dem "befreundeten" Pell um Hilfe bat, ihn informierte! , reist just nach Rom um ERNEUT Pell zu beschuldigen. Der sich nicht so richtig erinnern moechte.)

9TV zeigt in dem video, wie archbishop cardinal Pell den Kinderschaender "Vater" Ridsdale Seite an Seite ins Gericht begleitet. An der Seite des missbrauchten Jungen David Ridsdale ist Pell nicht zu sehen.

And THEN: Now this archbishop cardinal Pell with his proven competence in the COVER-UP of child abuse and his proven abilities of lieing about his PERSONAL involvement since he knew at least one of the victims, AT LEAST!! - I BET he knew more! - is Pope Francis No.1, the right hand, in - !!!! L O L !!!! - cleaning the IOR, the Vaticanbank????? Hmmmmm. Let us believe that Pope Francis does not know that?

And then I must see this man by the side of the child-molester when Ridsdale is on his way to his trial? Pell holding the hand of the criminal child-molester "Father" Ridsdale on his way to jail? This is MUCH WORSE than I thought.

Pell accompanies one of the worst child offenders, "father" Gerald Ridsdale to support him in court 1993

Pretty tough. Pretty MUCH! Does this look SERIOUSLY that these guys are among the bad human trash, right?

NOT only the NOTORIOUS CHILD MOLESTER "FATHER" RIDSDALE, BUT "Father" archbishop cardinal PELL, too????? Hhhhhhhhholy .HIT!

And I do NOT wish to see ANYBODY show up and tell me I am using inappropriate language: because I do NOT! The words I use are still MUCH TO WEAK for what such devils have done, and still do!

Oh boy, oh boy!!! And Ridsdale still going strong until 1993.

Sie werden mir auch DAS hier NICHT glauben, ich weiss doch! Datenbank TAUSENDER bekannter in sexuellen und/oder Kindesmissbrauch verwickelter (ueberwiegend) paedophiler Angehoeriger der katholischen Kirche! Mit Namen und Passbildern! HUNDERTTAUSENDE von Opfern.

Als papa Franz Pell auf die zweithoechste Stelle im Vatican, auf den Chefposten der Vaticanbank IOR berufen hat, hat er mit einem simplen, naheliegenden Schachzug, der weder hoehere Intelligenz oder gar goettliche Eingebung erfordert, mindestens zwei Fliegen mit einer Klappe erschlagen: er hat Pell in Australien aus dem Feuer gezogen, und er hat einen Vertuschungsspezialisten dahin befoerdert wo's brennt. Ich vermute, die EU koennte mit MoneyVal weiter versuchen, zu hoeherer Einsicht zu gelangen. Pell ist ganz zweifellos der geeignete Mann, um das moeglichst zu verhindern: insbesondere durch wohlgefaellige, wohlfeile, so billige wie folgenlose Lippenbekenntnisse, durch Eingestaendnisse der Schuld. Ansonsten jedoch durch die Errichtung und Verteidigung fast unueberwindbarer Mauern

Ich habe mich gefragt, ob Pell wohl nach Australien zurueckfliegt, hier und da. Sagen wir: auf Heimaturlaub, oder um "Vater" Ridsdale zu besuchen?

Obwohl das vielen Australiern und mancher Behoerde nicht gefallen wird, braucht er strafrechtliche Verfolgung kaum zu befuerchten: er duerfte papa Franz zum Danke diplomatische Immunitaet geniessen.

An gelegentlicher Heimkehr koennte ihn daher allenfalls die Befuerchtung unfreundlicher Medienberichte und eines oeffentlichen Aufschreis der Empoerung hindern?

Ich versichere Ihnen: derart UNGEHEUERLICHES haben Sie vermutlich NOCH NIE gesehen!

Vierjaehrige Kinder. Geistig Behinderte. Alles da! Hier werden (Schweigegeld - ?)Zahlungen der Kirche genannt. Sind das DREISTELLIGE Millionen-Betraege? Aus Kirchensteuern und Klingelbeuteln? Addieren sie nur 'mal die Summen auf zwei, drei Seiten!

Ich halte hier fest, dass in den letzten Jahren katholische Dioezesen Material zur Liste beigesteuert haben. Sie sehen allerdings auch hier SOFORT, dass nur ein Bruchteil der Beschuldigten einsitzt. Die WEITAUS meisten Taeter gehen frei aus.

Alfred J. Bietighofer, Dioezesan, Bridgeport Connecticut.

Mindestens 4 Maenner tragen in 2002 vor, dass Bietighofer sie in den spaeten 1970ern, den fruehen 80ern in der Gemeinde Blessed Sacrament missbraucht hat. Wurde in St. Luke's zur Therapie behandelt 5/02. Erhaengte sich im Zimmer dort. Diente in Peru in 1974 und 1986. Ein Offizieller der Dioezese wusste von den Vorwuerfen gegen Bietighofer in 1996. Klagen gegen Bietighofer von der Dioezese im Vergleichswege geregelt als Teil massiver aussergerichtlicher Einigungen in 10/03. Die Dioezese zahlte $21 MILLIONEN US$ an 40 Klaeger. 16 Priester betroffen. Neuerliche Klage anhaengig 12/09.

John J. Bonzagni, Dioezesan, Springfield, Massachussetts.

EIN anderes Beispiel. Nicht das Uebelste. Aus VIELEN hunderten.

Klage einer Frau in 2003: sie sei von Bonzagni in drei Faellen befummelt worden als sie 16 war und sich auf ihre Weihe, Kommunion vorbereitete. Sie hat die Dioezese zweimal, zuerst in 2002 informiert.) Fall aussergerichtlich beigelegt in 8/04 als Teil eines $7.5 Millionen US$ - Vergleichs , der mit 45 Klaegern geschlossen wurde. In der Dioezese Springfield 18 Priester beschuldigt. Bonzagni verliess die Dioezese in 11/04. Zum Monsignore ernannt 12/06. Chef des pastoralen Planungsbueros in 2008. Ernannt zum co-vicar der Dioezese. Ernannt Chef von 3 Kirchengemeinden in 12/15. Springfield

Da sind schon 'mal 28,5 MILLIONEN US$ bezahlt worden, in NUR ZWEI Sammelklagen gegen 34 Priester. Reden wir ueber eine MILLIARDEN - Groessenordnung von US$ Schweigegeld?

Donald J. Bowen, Dioezesan, Fall River, Massachussetts.

Das Maedchen war beim ersten Missbrauch 9 Jahre alt. Die Sache lief bis sie 16 war, demnach 7 Jahre lang. Schrieb Briefe in denen er versprach, das Priesteramt aufzugeben und sie zu heiraten. Sie informierte die Dioezese 1990 und erhielt 1992 $ 200.000 im Vergleich. Anklage Boston in 2002. Wegen unanstaendigen Angriffs und Koerperverletzung einer Person unter 14 sowie wolluestiger Akte an einer Person unter 16. Bekannte sich schuldig in 2005; 2 Jahre Gefaengnis und 10 Jahre Bewaehrung sowie Registrierung als Sexualstraftaeter. Nicht in Listen auffindbar 2/10.

200.000 US$ sind erstaunlich hoch. Zumeist wurden pro Fall etwa 25.000 bis 50.000 US $ von der katholischen Kirche bezahlt.

Robert H. Brom, Dioezesan, Duluth, Minnesota.

Brom, derzeit Bischof von San Diego, sagte in 2006 aus, dass er in den 1990ern Gegenstand von Ermittlungen war hinsichtlich der Teilnahme an einer besonderen Orgie im Seminar mit Verbindung zum Kardinal. Ein Seminarist beschuldigte Brom, damals Bischof von Duluth, ihn und andere zum sex gezwungen zu haben. Vergleich geschlossen ueber $100.000 US$. Brom leugnete. Bemuehungen zwecks Einsicht in Dokumente fuer die Ermittlungen scheiterten als die Dioezese bankrott erklaerte 3/07. Brom in Ruhestand 9/13.

Robert H. Brom, Dioezesan, Duluth, Minnesota.

Accused of abuse. Resigned 5/91 per Archdiocesan list updated in 2009. Original date of resignation was 1/93. Included in 10/03 settlement of claims of 15 men and women who alleged abuse by 12 priests. Total settlement was more than $8M. Archdiocese settled at least one claim in 5/07 $6.65M settlement with 14 people alleging abuse by 12 priests. Laicized 8/10. Died 4/11.

Neil Doherty, Dioezesan, Miami, Florida.

Leute, WIRKLICH: Obwohl ich Euch ja nun schon einen kleinen Bruchteil meines WISSENS hier zeige, schlaegt das WAHRE Ausmass alle Masstaebe und unsere VORSTELLUNGSKRAFT! Relativ harmlos sieht der Doherty in der Datenbank aus.

Abgezogen 2002. Angeklagt 2003 wg. Missbrauchs von 4-5 Kindern. Kirche unterrichtet seit 1979 als die erste Beschwerde kam. Aussergerichtliche Beilegung 1994 $50.000 US$. Neue Anklage 2005 Missbrauch eines 11 Jahre alten Jungen ueber 5 Jahre ab 1997. Verhaftet 2006. Klage(n) beigelegt nach Zahlung(en) in 2006. 2 Klagen beigelegt 6/07. 3 weitere Anklaeger treten auf in 4/07. Mehrfach angeklagt in 2007-2013. Wieder im Knast 11/10. Schadenersatz im Prozess $100.000.000 (MILLIONEN!) US$ 11/11. Plaedierte auf "unschuldig" in Strafprozess 1/14/13. Zu 15 Jahren verurteilt 1/28/13.

LEUTE! KOMMT! Das ist nur EIN EINZIGER Priester! In der Datenbank findet man allein 5 FUENF! verschiedene Taeter mit demselben Nachnamen "Doherty"!!! Die Kirche wusste seit 1979 dass etwas im Busch war. Seit 1979 hat die Kirche vertuscht.... und gezahlt......vertuscht.... und gezahlt......vertuscht.... und gezahlt......vertuscht.... und gezahlt......vertuscht.... und gezahlt......vertuscht.... und gezahlt......

Mit EUERN Kirchensteuern. Mit Eurem Geld aus dem Klingelbeutel. Mit Euern SPENDEN!

Nur EIN Mann. UEBER EINHUNDERT MILLIONEN US$. Ich kann das selbst kaum glauben!

Durchaus umstritten ist, ob es sich bei dem SCHLIMMSTEN paedophilen Priester, der je in den Staaten verhaftet wurde, handelt um Neil Doherty: andere Mitwettbewerber um den Titel liegen durchaus stark im Rennen. Ehemaliger Schueler des St. John Vianney, groesster Teil der Karriere in Florida. Diente als Direktor im berufsbildenden Priesterseminar unter Robert Lynch. Mindestens DREISSIG JAHRE LANG vergewaltigte Doherty ein KIND nach dem anderen. Er gab ihnen Alkohol und Quaaludes (Ludes, Methaqualon, usw., ein HARTE Droge!) schaendete sie anal bis sie bluteten. KINDER! KINDER! KINDER! Er war Kirlin's engster Freund und haeufiger Uebernachtungsgast. Was also wusste Kirlin? Was wussten Souckar? Und Favalora?

Die Kirche redet NICHT. Die Kirche quasselt STAENDIG! ABER DIE KIRCHE REDET ! ! ! N I E ! ! ! Und WENN sie redet LUEGT sie. Die Kirche vollbringt das faszinierende Kunststueck, sogar dann zu LUEGEN, wenn sie die Wahrheit sagt.

Sie verstehen nicht? Ich erklaere es Ihnen: Die Kirche legt immer wieder (SCHEIN-)Gestaendnisse ab. So, wie "heiliges, unfehlbares""Papst" Franciscus sagt: "Ich bete fuer die Kinder, die von Priestern missbraucht wurden." Die WAHRHEIT, und dennoch LUEGE dann, wenn ihn die Opfer nicht scheren. Dann, wenn er HOECHSTSUMMEN SCHWEIGEGELD zahlt. Anstelle von Wiedergutmachung. Dann, wenn er weiterhin Beschuldigungen vertuscht. Und dann, wenn er - wie das durchgaengige Politik der katholischen Kirche ist -, die Taeter vor Strafverfolgung schuetzt.

Aber ja doch, ich weiss doch: Sie weisen ALL' DAS zurueck. SIE greifen MICH an, anstelle der Taeter. Weil ICH Ihnen WAHRHEIT ueber die LUEGNER zumute, die Ihnen nicht gefaellt.

Zitate: james_from_cambridge 7/28/11 3:23pm "Katholische Kirche = Gottverdammter Haufen heuchlerischer Tunten! WER sind die IDIOTEN, die noch zur Messe gehen und den Schweinen insbesondere ihr Geld geben?" - Antwort ObscureNerdReferenceGoesHere 7/28/11 3:46pm "Ich bin so Einer. Dazu muss man allerdings wissen, dass ich bereits eine lange Vorgeschichte jaemmerlicher Entscheidungen habe."

Wir sehen hier ein WEITERES Schema: die Opfer gehen praktisch immer zur Kirche. Und laufen vor die Wand. Sie gehen praktisch nie zur Polizei. Weltweit. Aus Gottesfurcht?

UND: Aber ja! Ich weiss doch! In Deutschland gibt es aber sowas nicht. Nur in Australien. Und in den USA. Und in Polen. Und in den Philippinen. Und. Und. Und. Weltweite Sache. Seit Jahrhunderten? Nur nicht in Deutschland. Keine Faelle bekannt? Keine Verurteilungen?

----------------------------

child abuse cover up

Understand! The cover-up is done by high-ranking-officials in the Vatican (bishops, cardinals, pope) who are not necessarily child-abusers themselves.

I have to talk about the australian archbishop Pell here and now. He is in Rome, in the vatican now. He is talking in the name of Pope Francis. He admitted and he confessed. Publicly. The crimes within the IOR, the vaticanbank. He confessed that all the issues I deal with, all the subjects I address are given FACTS! Confirmed by vatican, by the pope.

Phantastic! This guy is a walking confession.

Especially he confirms: money laundering, black accounts, hidden money (between 500 million and 1.5 BILLION euro hidden. If they admit 1.5 Billion usually it is 5 times as much. At least. Says MY experience, my knowledge, my beliefs!) , falsification of balance-sheets. Everything. The child-abuse. And child-abuse cover-up. Oh, good! Super!

But, then I thought: "Ok. He might be. But until now I saw him only do what they ALL do, ALWAYS: Admit if they have to. So HOW can I find out, among ALL the LIARS,if this guy is honest, if this guy is decent?

It looks really difficult. But I did it. And, again, within only TWO minutes I found the TRUTH. It is so easy, if You can only google. You to google "bishop pell" and in two minutes You get it.

How can You find out: You google the name. You do NOT go to the church's, the vatican's websites, not to the "Osservatore Romano". The reason is simple: They are involved, they are party, the are part of the scams, the cover-ups. And do NOT let sites fool You that pretend to be "independent"!

And even though I dearly do love wikipedia I do NOT go there first! Because wikipedia is an open platform. Countless catholic christians work on wikipedia all the time. And they want the catholic church and the vatican to look good. Since I follow this for many years I KNOW. The articles are frequently being changed. Sometimes they are more in favour of a critical position, af few weeks later in favour of the church. Again. Mostly the favourize and celebrate the church.

Really: this guy sounds like the first decent, honest guy in the history of the vatican. Is he the first "holy" man who does not have dirty hands? Who is not a LIAR, a pretender?

Which are the criteria to find out whether he is a LIAR?

a) Did he ever confess, admit BEFORE anything was already public? - I could not find any hints!

b) Did he ever hand over hints, data, files, witnesses, suspects to criminal investigation? - I could not find any hints!

c) Did he ever tell about the successful conviction of a suspicious priest who was sentenced to jail? - I could not find any hints!

d) Is there only the slightest indication that he took care of the victims? Instead of the cheap, empty words like those his boss pope Francis used: "I am terrified, I pray for You!" ? - I could not find any hints!

e) Did he ever make a press-conference saying: "We are deeply shocked and concerned. We are permanently working hard to fix these terrible things. Let me give You a summary of our cooperation with the police. Here is a list of the names of the priests who are under suspicion. THIS is what we do to help the victims. Here are the names of the victims that are witnesses, and who are no only willing to give testimony in court, but who are willing, with real name or without, to talk to the media." - I could not find any hints!

What I found within only two minutes is THIS: In the media the question is being discussed whether Pell is a LIAR. Oh, oh. Not so good. But does not mean much. Then I find bishops accusing him.

Other bishops accuse him of lieing. Oh, oh.

Then he is being questioned by a royal commission in Australia, he is under investigation. Oh, oh. Turns worth.

WHAT does he tell the commission?

Cardinal George Pell has again denied having knowledge of the activities of notorious pedophile priest Father Gerard Ridsdale, dismissing it as a “sad story” that “wasn’t of much interest to me”.

Cardinal Pell continued to deny knowledge of Ridsdale having molested children, despite attending meetings agreeing to move him numerous times, and the widespread nature of complaints about the pedophile’s activities in the Victorian parish of Inglewood in 1975.

"“I had no reason to turn my mind to the extent of the evils that Ridsdale had perpetrated.” - Oh boy!!!!

So we already have it, in only 2 minutes: This is precisely, EXACTLY the scheme of operation, the vatican code of conduct I know for decades, now:

Pretty tough. Pretty MUCH! "notorious pedophile priest Father Gerard Ridsdale - despite attending meetings agreeing to move him numerous times, , and the widespread nature of complaints about the pedophile’s activities in the Victorian parish of Inglewood in 1975." Does this look SERIOUSLY that this guy is the worst human trash, right?

NOT only the NOTORIOUS CHILD MOLESTER FATHER RIDSDALE, BUT archbishop PELL, too????? Hhhhhhhhholy SHIT!

And I do NOT wish to see ANY IDIOT show up and tell me I am using inappropriate language: because I do NOT! The words I use are still MUCH TO WAEK for what such devils have done, and still do!

.......and the widespread nature of complaints about the pedophile’s activities in the Victorian parish of Inglewood in 1975.

So vatican code of conduct, again, and business as usual! First deny comment. If You are forced to comment You say You knew nothing. If You are forced to admit You confess. NEVER more than already known. Regret. Then You are fine. Data filed. You can carry on unharmed. Same procedure as every year.

But then usually there are already many things showing that this guy is actively moving priests, moving child-molesters to protect them from prosecution.

Result of only a quick check: Pell, too, is not the decent, honest man. He is part of the cover-up.

You find sufficient information in only one press article - there are many, many more:

9news Australia on archbishop Pell. Business as usual. I did the work for You. Here are the substantial HINTS. Now YOU check YOURSELF whether I fool You or not!

And, oh, I nearly forgot: This is the guy that Chritiane Amanpour, global cnn anchorwoman laudeates as the good guy who is telling the truth, who is cleaning up following the orders of the pope Francis to clean the house. Oh, oh,oh, oh.

Now! Amanpour, again. I do not wish to believe it! She should NOT talk about things she does not KNOW. But she does. Incessantly. Confirming me when I sum up that she has NO IDEA what she is talking about. So she does NOT know what I know in only TWO minutes? CHICKEN-STUFF! I feel so bad having to say this again: Because this is THE TRUTH!

WHAT the hell does she do??? Ok. She is a busy chick. I understand. She is, she thinks GOBAL. So how can she find time to update her (not given!) "expertise"? The authority letting HER teach US things?

But she has a whole "hhhhhholy?" team working for her? Don't they know their job of RESEARCH, of finding material, too? Do they manipulate her? Do they feed her with what she airs WORLDWIDE, without counter-check, to us, as meaningful information???? Unbelievable? UNBELIEVABLE! But I am afraid we have to accept that this is the way things are, in cnn!

holy wars/crusades

inquisition

You need more? You get more! But if this is not already enough to cut all Your engagements with the catholic church You have to ask Yourself whether sth is seriously wrong inside Your head.

money laundering - Vatican Banks (IOR, Banca Di Roma, and ALL the others)

They enthroned the man who was the first to really be "God's Banker": Bernardino Nogara.

wikipedia: Bernardino Nogara

Understand! MoneyVal is the European Community's (EC) control commission for banks. They can go into any bank in Europe. They cannot go into the Vatican because of Autonomy and diplomatic immunity. Essentially the only one to control the IOR is the IOR. They found a way to "convince" the Vatican to let them in. The appointment they got was made weeks earlier. This makes clear they only saw prepared files. Same game as with Iran and the control of nuclear facilities. Smart contract, Mr. Obama.

Under Nogara the vatican held stakes of (italian) weapon manufacturers. Are they still engaged today? Then:

international weapon deals

involvement in Holocaust

fraternization with Mussolini

fraternization with Adolf Hitler

bishops, cardinals, priests turned Nazis

The church handed over their baptize registers to the Nazis. So the Nazis could immediately see who was catholic. And who was not, who was jewish.

mafia/cosa nostra/Calabrian ‘Ndrangheta/Campanian Camorra/organised crime links

Understand! Not ONE organisation: ALL of them! The roots are - as mostly! - hundreds of years ago in Vatican history.

Vatican Prostitution Rings, Gay Networks, and Blackmail

homosexuality

baby theft

Understand! There are AT LEAST two different aspects of baby-theft. Several popes authorized/committed (forced) baptizing of jewish kids to turn them catholics. They "rectified" this saying the jewish parents were abusing their children. Then: Right now in Spain: "A recent investigation has revealed a number of secret networks of nuns, priests, doctors, and nurses who conspired to steal as many as 300,000 Spanish babies. Over the course of at least five decades, many Spanish hospitals, often run by the Church, told mothers that their children died during or after childbirth. If the mothers insisted on seeing their babies, they were often shown an infant’s corpse. The babies were then spirited away for adoption by “approved” families. In some cases, they were sold to childless couples for large sums. "

celibacy

sick weird sexual doctrines

censorship

blasphemy

Understand! If You are in command of a criminal organisation that is necessarily full of lies: What do You do? First You do not want people to find out. So You blacklist media/books, whatever, that You do not want the faithful to read. Because these tell the truth, they uncover the lies. Then You accuse the heretics of blasphemy, so You can fight them, torture them, kill them. Got it?

"Mother-Teresa"-S C A M

Then there is so MUCH MORE!!!! The vatican's mother-Teresa- scam for example. 650 million US$ donated for her missionaries. Nothing arrived there. Somebody should pass the knowledge to Mr. Trump!

Understand! What the canadian scientists in Montreal brought together was NOTHING NEW, NOT AT ALL. It was already known during Teresa's lifetime. The church did not care. Because they wanted the scam. The swedish Nobel prize Committee did not care. They do not care until today.

Teresa in wikipedia. Time to update this trash!

You find the TRUTH about "mother" Teresa here:

Huffington Post: Mother Teresa Humanitarian Image A 'Myth,' New Study Says

Problem is: The Huffington Post is in Error: NOTHING new about that! These facts were already known by those with better informations in the 1990s BEFORE she died in 1997.

And HERE:

Mother Teresa ...—and the Vatican—were even worse than we thought

And HERE:

‘The dark side of Mother Teresa’

And HERE:

Mother Teresa: anything but a saint...

You find the TRUTH about "mother" Teresa!

Please DO UNDERSTAND: There is no doubt that this is movie-evidence of her own genuine hospice in Calcutta. You can clearly see in the pictures, that there is NO money in that place. You do not need the story, You only need Your eyes! So WHERE are the 650 MILLION US$ the church collected with the mother-Teresa-SCAM????